Healthcare Reform Package Passes House After Compromise on Choice

Last night, the Democrats were finally able to push through their health insurance reform package when the House passed the Senate bill. It was passed with the slimmest margin, 219-212, with three Democrats switching their previous stances to “nay” votes. Overall, 34 Democrats joined in the unanimous Republicans opposition. Click here to see how all Representatives voted.

This came after a long weekend of contention, protests, and negotiations between anti-choice Democrats led by Rep. Bart Stupak, who virtually caved under the pressure by striking a deal with President Obama. Obama will now be signing an executive order guaranteeing “an adequate enforcement mechanism to ensure that federal funds are not used for abortion services” and continue the existing prohibition of federal funds for abortion care similar to the Hyde Amendment for Medicaid.

The President promised status quo for abortion care, but this bill is anything but status quo. In a last minute backroom deal to pass the bill in the Senate, Democratic Senators Barbara Boxer (CA) and Harry Reid (NV) helped create a compromise to appease anti-choice Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE). The compromise, which is in the bill waiting for the President’s signature, would require women and families who buy coverage with abortion care within the exchange, regardless of if they receive government subsidies, to write two checks for their insurance coverage. One of the checks will be for the abortion coverage. The plan before the compromise already called for a prohibition of federal abortion spending. All the abortion compromises and the subsequent executive order were just political pandering to a few anti-choice members of Congress so they would support the bill. What Democrats proved is they were willing to compromise reproductive health care for millions of woman in order to pass a badly flawed bill. They succeeded.

This will not be the last time we hear about and fight for coverage of abortion care. This will be another political football ran up and down the field depending on who is in power and who they are trying to appease. Just another prime example on why the government should not decide on care and what is covered.

The Senate is now working this week on the package of “fixes” the House already passed. The fixes do not include any changes to abortion coverage, but supposed measures to lower the deficit. We will continue to update you as the fixes are passed, the bill is signed and we see changes in the law.


5 Comments on “Healthcare Reform Package Passes House After Compromise on Choice”

  1. Roberta Francis says:

    Wait a minute! You say, “What Democrats proved is they were willing to compromise reproductive health care for millions of women in order to pass a badly flawed bill.” But you say nothing about the fact that the Republicans in Congress are overwhelmingly opposed to the RMC’s view of “reproductive health care for millions of women” in their public policy positions across the board. I’m a Democrat who believes you’re doing good and important work for women. You have every right to be partisan — but please don’t be hypocritical. We supporters of reproductive rights have enough other people to do that for us!

    • Kate says:

      Roberta, I completely disagree. How the heck does this bill protect women? It’s made a legally protected medical decision something that many women may not be able to afford to obtain. The only women being protected by this are the ones who can afford the riders- or to pay for an abortion on their own. God forbid they need an expensive procedure due to severe fetal abnormalities or a non-viable pregnancy and they never purchased the rider, thinking they would never abort. I sure hope they have a 10k lying around for that procedure!

      Democrats didn’t just sell us women out- they gleefully tied us to the traintracks.

  2. sparky says:

    Today there are at least two losing stories with this pathetic bill – first is the utter disregard members of both parties have demonstrated toward women, they have lost a constitutional guarantee of privacy; the second is that it does absolutely nothing to improve health care. I’d like to propose a couple of hundred additional losers on Election Day, 2010. Feel free to participate in exercising your franchise before that one disappears to.

  3. Harley says:

    There are ways to support Choice other than throwing in with Socialists. I, for one, am OFF this list.

    • John says:

      It must be discouraging for you at RMC. There are very few Republican elected officials for Choice left. The public personae of those that may still be around have been overwhelmed by those on the far right who have taken over the Party, shouted “baby killer”, “homo” and the “N” word (egged on by the indecorous spectacle on the House railing), generally giving any thinking person real hesitation about identifying oneself as a Republican. My wife and I are passionate about your cause, but after some reflection we think it would be better served in a practical sense under a Democrat Party banner.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s